Search This Blog

Sunday, 30 November 2014

Missing the Word

Missing the Word
As I suspect is true of too many of my fellow Christian' lives, just as it is in mine, there are times when we do not read the Bible as regularly, as frequently or as much as we really should. I realized as soon as I wrote that title though that it could also lead to a misunderstanding and not really convey what I am discussing here. I am not just referring to reading words on a page in the book; I am talking about missing fellowship with God, our Heavenly Father, that occurs when we read the Bible, The Word. That is the ultimate point of the Bible, communion with God. In reading it, we open ourselves to further communication through the Holy Spirit, as we are enlightened about what we read by the very same Person that we believe inspired the writing to begin with (John 14:26; 15:26).

My understanding of how we as Christians view the Bible is that it is an inspired record that God has given us to show us how he is at work in his creation, particularly on earth and in the lives of humans. We do not regard it in the same way as I understand the Orthodox teaching of the Muslim is about the Koran, namely that every word is sacred in Arabic as it is written and therefore can never be altered.  They believe this because the belief is that the entire document was given in this form to the original Prophet Muhammad over a period of time in the early 7th century CE. That is why you will find orthodox Muslim scholars even discounting the study of the Koran in different languages. Some of them therefore then also have difficulty with we Christians who have the Bible that has come down through so many languages, translations and copies. They don't believe that we can have a believable record anymore.

The first Bible delivered to me as my very own copy of this The Word of God was a King James Version, which was the only form known to most English-speaking Christians at the time (I am referring to the early 1950s). I believe it was a 7th birthday gift. I read that through, although not immediately of course. While attending Canadian Mennonite Bible College in the mid-60s, I purchased the version used for the most part there, the Revised Standard Version, and read that in its entirety. A few years later, when the New English Bible came out, I read all of it. I have read the Bible from cover-to-cover several more times since then. Now I have begun to read a “Green” edition of the New Revised Standard Version. This is a special version that highlights everything in the Scriptures that has to do, according to its editors, with creation and the environment. I had just before this, for the first time ever, purchased a study Bible, in the form of the Harper Collins Study Bible, which is another New Revised Standard Version translation. I had not really felt much of a need for this type of Bible previously because even my very first Bible had cross-references, a concordance and other such study helps that served me well over the years.

So, I have read through The Word a number of times. I have studied it from when I was an elementary age Sunday School student until the present time. I have taught it to Sunday school classes, led small groups in its study and preached sermons based on it. When I was about 12-years-of age, I remember wanting to read it diligently to discover all the rules I could to live the proper life of a Christian.

However, I must confess that it was not until I was almost middle-aged that I reached the point where the desire to read the Bible came from somewhere inside of me, not because of that external compulsion that this was something a Christian should do. To me, this could only have happened because of having reached a certain degree of maturity as a Christian, having come to the point in my relationship with God were I really wanted to keep in touch with Him through His Word. It is the indwelling Holy Spirit prompting me to keep up my communion with God.

So, this is where I am when I said to the current small group of our congregation of which I am currently the leader, I have missed the fact that we have not been meeting this fall, as it has had a negative impact on my reading and studying the word, and therefore my being in communion with God. Now I truly sometimes say with the psalmist David, "As the heart pants after the water brooks, so my soul pants after you, O God." (Psalm 42:1) He actually expresses it a little more graphically yet in Psalm 119:131: “I opened my mouth and panted: for I long for your commandments." (Commandments is just one of many words David uses, especially in Psalm 119, to refer to the Word of God.) Therefore, I am going to begin, as it were, to catch up on the studies that we would have done this fall, had we been meeting.

Sunday, 19 October 2014

LEADERS OR SERVANTS

LEADERS OR SERVANTS?

I. Introduction
When I first wrote this, our neighbour of 18 years passed away recently. He was someone who had taught himself to play violin. He went on to establish quite a reputation among violin players in this country. Of course, he and his friends referred to the instrument more often as a fiddle. At his funeral it was said that he was a man who was content to play second fiddle.

That sentiment is just the opposite of what was once said about violinists of whom the famous conductor Leonard Bernstein once spoke. When he was asked what was the hardest part of being an orchestra conductor he said, “Getting people to play second fiddle”.

II. Leadership

We hear a lot about leadership these days. It seems to be important in education and business. Now it even seems to be important in the Church.  You can open any Christian magazine and see ad after ad about leadership seminars and schools that will turn out better leaders. Somehow this makes me uncomfortable. I suspect if I convey that discomfort to the people who are putting out these ads they will say something like “You just need to get with the times. Leadership is where it’s at”. They would tell you that you need to discern what your gifts are, and if they include leadership, you need to develop that. Of course, they are there to help you do that – and if I wanted to be cynical about that I could add, ‘for a fee’.  Furthermore, if you follow those steps, they would give you the impression that you will be so much better off as a person spiritually, and so will be your Church. I am not sure I agree with entirely with these sentiments.  I believe Jesus’ teachings told us otherwise.

So, why am I concerned about leadership?
1. In the first place leadership is important because we all have leaders.  Moreover, our congregation is again looking at changes in leadership.  Not only are we going to fill our church positions again, we are also going to have to look at what we are going to do in the very near future in terms of our Pastoral leadership.
2.  Secondly, we all have a responsibility to look at the people we nominate or elect to see whether they have the qualities of leadership. Leadership is important because we all choose leaders.
3. Thirdly, most of us do have a position of leadership in some area in our lives.

READ Our Daily Bread (Radio Bible Class devotional) MARCH 27, 2000

So, leadership is important because we may all be leaders.

Getting back to my dis-ease with what I see as the current emphasis on leadership. In my understanding of the Kingdom of God, the accent is on servanthood. Yet, we now have a leadership commission in our conference. Can one be a servant and a leader at the same time?                                                             

There is a time for leaders and leadership.  We as a congregation need to look at what we have and want in leadership. I think the old saying, ‘You get the government you deserve’ could just as soon be applied to the Church to say, ‘You get the leadership you deserve’.   

III. Definition

So, where do we as Christians turn for our definition of leadership?  The word ‘leadership’ doesn't even occur in The Bible. The word ‘lead’ occurs some 50 times, referring often to God’s leading of the Children of Israel. The word leader occurs only three times: references to leaders of Israel and it’s enemies. None of these references were to Jesus, or even his followers.

This might make one think that the Bible doesn’t say much about leadership. We can probably come up with a number of examples of persons in the Bible who were leaders. Was Jesus one of them?  What words did Jesus and his followers talk about when they talked about their role?  They used the word servant. Look at what Paul wrote in Phil. chapter 2 vss. 7 to 8 when he was talking about Jesus:
“He made himself of no reputation, and took upon himself the form of a servant, and being made in the likeness of man, humbling himself and becoming obedient to death, even the death of the cross.”  

In fact, Jesus was even spoken of as a servant in the prophecies that foretold his coming.  Look at Isaiah chapter 42:1:
“Behold my servant, whom I uphold, my elect, in whom my soul delights".

And what did Jesus say to his followers in Matthew chapter 20 vs. 25:
“You know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them.  But it shall not be so among you: whoever will be great among you, that one shall be a minister; and whoever will be chief among you, that one shall be your servant: even as the Son of Man came not to be ministered to, but to minister".

In another place, he told his disciples that he was “among them as one who serves”: Luke 22 vs. 27.

He also said that "He that is greatest among you shall be your servant”: Matthew 23 vs. 11.

Is servanthood something we can equate with leadership? I believe it is.

Leadership has been described as the process of: "enabling a group to engage together in the process of developing, sharing and moving into vision, and then living it out."  Leaders are individuals who fulfil six functions. When they do this there is movement. We could say we TRAVEL:

Let’s review these six functions:

1.    Leaders are teachers.
They have something which they want to pass on to their followers.  This could be knowledge.  It could be skills. The buzzword here today is 'equippers'. Leaders, including especially pastors, are expected to be able to teach their followers so that they will be able to carry out the tasks they are called to. We need to be equipped to make the vision reality.

2.    Leaders develop relationships.
To teach and influence, you have to get to know your followers. Leaders have to know their followers. We have the image of the shepherd knowing his flock. Jesus knows us; as the Good Shepherd, He calls us by our name, and we know His voice. You can’t serve well if you don’t know your flock, your followers.

3.    Leaders exhibit attraction.
Leaders need followers. Particularly with the Christian model for leadership, the servant model I believe Jesus portrayed, we are looking for followers. Do we know those we would like to get on board with us in pursuit of the fulfilment of that vision? What are we doing to bring them on side? Are they attracted by what they can see of our vision? By our character and enthusiasm for what we are doing?

4.    Leaders have vision.
Leaders need to be persons with a vision, an idea, a goal, a plan. You can’t lead if you don’t know where you’re going. Do we know our leaders’ vision? Do we have a vision we wish others had? Is the vision being developed and shared? Is it being lived out?

5.    Leaders are examples.
Servant leaders, as we all should be as followers of our Leader, our Lord, are only seeking to influence others to catch the vision Christ planted in his ministry on earth. This vision is not only for this earth, but for eternity. So much leadership focus seems to be on structure, building a church of a certain ideal here on earth. We look for a Kingdom where lives are changed, whose origins and centre are heavenly, not earthly. This is a Kingdom where there is no room for striving for power and authority, no room for titles. We are looking for leaders who themselves are followers of Christ and exemplify that in their lives.

6.    Leaders love.
Behind all of this, to get to first base to begin with, and to be effective in the end, Christian leaders have to be known to their Leader and Lord. They have to be individuals of faith in God who spend time with Him in the study of His Word. They have to spend time in prayer. Leaders have to know and love their God. They also have to love their followers.

 

So, did you get that mnemonic about leaders who T-R-A-V-E-L? T for teachers, R for relationships, A for attraction, V for vision, E for example, and L for love. Does Jesus show us all these criteria? Of course he does.

IV. Characteristics of a Servant Leader

Servant leadership is at the heart of Christian leadership. All Christians are called to be servants, serving each other, following Jesus' example in washing his disciples' feet, and loving our neighbours as ourselves. Servant leadership is not a particular style of leadership, but rather relates to the motivation behind a leader's thoughts, words and actions. I have grouped the characteristics of Christian Leadership under six Cs.

1. Calling
Christian leaders must be called. It is not enough for themselves to have a feeling or an opinion that they are called.  The people whom they believe they are called to be a leader amongst must also accept that this potential leader has been called.  This calls for the process of discernment.

2. Comprehension
Leaders must know what leadership is.  As George Barna put it in his book about leadership, A
FishOut of Water: "Authentic leadership is not about position, power, popularity, or perks; it is about  
obedience and servanthood, resulting in transformation". Leaders must understand that.

3. Character

READ ODB 2004/2/23 PAR. 1-3

Leaders must possess character, the type of that moves people to trust them to take them to places - spiritual, emotional, relational, and intellectual - that they otherwise would not go… such character demands intense and lifelong commitment". Without it, leaders are just actors, leading people into the following them by “an illusion of trustworthiness”.

4. Competency or Capability
Leaders must be competent, capable.  They must be able to "moves people toward meaningful outcomes".  This does take skills, and these are things that can be learned if we’re not born with them. A true leader will also understand his strengths and weaknesses and gather others around him or her who will make up for these deficiencies.

READ ODB JULY 31, 1994          “Dwight D. Eisenhower – for the younger of you who may not
remember that name; he was the president of the United States before John F. Kennedy – used to demonstrate…           

5. Compliant
Christian leaders must be compliant. They must be obedient to their ultimate leader, our Lord Jesus. Servant leaders are not leaders on the basis of their position or leadership role, but rather lead according to their calling, vision and principles. What underpins servant leadership is the motivation behind our actions as leaders. It is not personal desire. Servant leadership will require us also to set aside personal gain, to make sacrifices, and to put the needs of others above the direction we may prefer for ourselves. You've probably met people who are highly career minded, people whose main motivation is to get themselves in a position where they will gain some reward. This is the complete opposite of servant leadership.

READ ODB June 17, 2002 Par. 1-4

So there we also have reference to an Old Testament character, Nehemiah, who modeled leadership as Christ did.

6. Consequences
Leaders must accept the consequences of their actions.  They must learn to take responsibility for the results of their choices.  They must be able to evaluate outcomes.  They must also be able to handle resistance and conflict that their attempts to move others and make changes will undoubtedly bring about.

Whilst serving others as the heart of leadership may not appear easy, it is perhaps in one sense easier for a leader to be consistent with the vision and values that they hold for themselves, rather than always
seeking to live upto an image, to constantly seek opportunities to sell themselves, or to be for ever trying to read the political signals sent out by others. This reminds me of a statement of a politically active friend about our elected representatives, whether to Ottawa or Winnipeg, maybe even to city hall. ‘From the moment they are elected’, he said, ‘they are working on their re-election’. That’s all about power and position, not service.

READ ODB JULY 19, 1993
 ODB November 25, 2001   "Leadership has its God-given privileges, but more important - it comes with huge responsibilities.” We know that neither we nor our leaders are always perfect. “That's why it's so important for every Christian in a leadership position to strive daily to keep his heart attuned to God and his word".            

VI. Conclusion
When we think about people, particularly in our congregation, who appear to be in positions of leadership: before we evaluate them we should ask ourselves: How close are we to God? We all need to give him the glory and honor due his name, obey his word, and worship him in spirit and truth. Leadership is not a vehicle for seeking recognition.  We are always to point to our Lord. We need to make it our prayer that to lead people more effectively, we and our leaders will have a real and deep faith in Christ.  Let us learn from the models, the characters that have gone before us.  Let them guide us in how we ought to develop the character necessary to be servants and/or leaders. Let us learn to use skills that work. As a daily devotional for this month put it: “The only leaders qualified to lead are those who have learned to serve”.  Let's not be ‘fish out of water’. The best leaders are those who are good followers and servants of our Lord Jesus Christ. Good leaders know the way, show the way, and go the way.  Let's follow, let's be the leader who follows and serves Christ. Only in that way can we serve as good leaders.  Good leaders are good servants.




*******



Lorne Brandt, 2004/2/1

NOT JUST FRIENDS

Scripture Reading:Luke 14:12 – 24
I. INTRODUCTION
What the Church is is an important topic and I think some of the difficulties the church has been facing call for a look at some aspects of what the church is that we may not have addressed adequately. I want to speak about some things the church is not, or shouldn’t be, but maybe has become.  In a sense that is a negative approach, but I hope I can help us look beyond that at changing these things if we are serious about following our Lord’s so-called Great Commission, about missions, outreach and church growth.

II. PEOPLE OF GOD – OLD TESTAMENT LESSON - 1
We often talk about the church as the People of God. This is a term used for those who believe in and follow God from Old Testament times already. I think that leads the way for us to learn some lessons from what happened to God’s chosen people, the Jews. The Apostle Paul actually spells out that lesson in chapters 9 – 1l of Romans. 

God calls us to be a people set apart from the world. Sometimes it seems we have taken that too far. We have isolated ourselves and become a people that perpetuates itself biologically more than by any other means. We have made ourselves into an ethnic group, almost a race. That is not what God intended. The Bible tells us over and over that God called us to reach out to others. God’s people are to grow in number by our outreach efforts, our witness, not just by how many children we have. Our confession of faith refers to us being called to commit ourselves to a life of discipleship and witness as empowered by the Holy Spirit”.

What happened when the first people God called, the descendants of Abraham, the Israelites, Hebrews, Jews became too inward-focussed and self-centred? God sent them plagues and famines and invading armies. Eventually he sent them into exile. More than once – the last time being AD 70, some say as a punishment for rejecting his Son the Messiah. What will God have to do to us to get us to see what he failed in the past to get Israel to see? God sent the Children of Israel into exile for becoming ethnic and disobedient. Maybe there's a reason we've been running from country to country. Will we learn?

III. NOT AN ETHNIC PEOPLE - OLD TESTAMENT LESSON – 2
I would like to propose to Mennonite churches that we can still be Mennonite, retain the true essence of Anabaptism, but delete all German/ethnic references in all church functions. We don't know how that
makes people feel left out unless we've been there. Unless we really don't want anyone but Mennonites of German ethnic background to be members of our churches. What about the majority of Mennonites in Africa, India, South America and Indonesia then??? Referring to vaspa, so-called Mennonite foods,
and throwing in German songs and German expressions in our church services and meetings has nothing to do with the gospel, with being Mennonite, but everything to do with being ethnic.


III. THE BODY OF CHRIST
Not just friends
I think part of our isolationism and ethnocentricity is our having become little more than groups of friends of common background banding together to form a congregation. Most of us want and need friends. The church is a good place to find them.

READ Radio Bible Class’s devotional Our Daily Bread 2004-11-14

However, even Jesus told us to make sure we had friends outside the church.

An Intentional Community With a Mission
The church is nowhere in the Bible described as a group of friends. We join it because of our commitment to Jesus Christ, not because of our relationships with people in it. It is a body with a purpose.

Part of this being with intent involves accountability. In a recent Sunday School lesson based on the Confession of Faith our High School class is studying it was agreed that we should never talk about others behind their backs. Are we guilty of too much of that? Do we spend more time doing that than praying about one another? What about talking to one another when we have a problem with something that we’ve done? Can we listen to one another without getting too hurt, without getting angry? We are instructed in the New Testament to admonish and correct one another for continuing in sin. Can we do that in the spirit of love and gentleness without it sounding judgmental, without it sounding that we are superior, self-righteous and fault-finding? I wonder if too often we aren’t critical of one another not so much because it’s a matter of sin but because we just disagree on an opinion or on how something should be done. If we don’t want to talk to the other person about it perhaps we should just be quiet rather than talk behind their back. On the other hand, if we are dealing with actual sin, we are to forgive and restore those who repent, although if they do not, there is a place for discipline and exclusion.

Activities not just inside these four walls
Nor is the Church something whose activities are limited to what goes on or is planned within these four walls. If we think that, someday the Holy Spirit is going to blow them out, or let us die and move elsewhere. The Church got along for decades, maybe even a century or more, without church buildings. It grew a lot faster than once it got confined to buildings.

Like the Early Church, we need to get out where the people are – where we go to school, where we work, where we do our sports. Some writers who are experienced in outreach say that what we really need to do is go where the poor and needy are. These are the folks that are hurting, need a friend, know they are lost. We are mostly so middle class. Many of our peers are doing just fine, thank you very much. They don’t see that they are missing anything. However, if we re going to reach out to the needy, we have to be prepared to accept them not our midst. Can we do that?

Indeed, isn’t this what Jesus taught?
Luke 14:12 Then said he also to him that bade him, When thou makest a dinner or a supper, call not thy friends, nor thy brethren, neither thy kinsmen, nor thy rich neighbours; lest they also bid thee again, and a recompence be made thee.
13  But when thou makest a feast, call the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind:
14  And thou shalt be blessed; for they cannot recompense thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just.

…and talked of in a parable?
16  Then said he unto him, A certain man made a great supper, and bade many:
17  And sent his servant at supper time to say to them that were bidden, Come; for all things are now ready.
18  And they all with one consent began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and I must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused.
19  And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them: I pray thee have me excused.
20  And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore I cannot come.
21  So that servant came, and shewed his lord these things. Then the master of the house being angry said to his servant, Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor, and the maimed, and the halt, and the blind.
22  And the servant said, Lord, it is done as thou hast commanded, and yet there is room.
23  And the lord said unto the servant, Go out into the highways and hedges, and compel them to come in, that my house may be filled.
24  For I say unto you, That none of those men which were bidden shall taste of my supper.

We need to move beyond our comfort zone. READ ODB 2001-6-24, 1999-2-11, 2000-8-5

Activities not just those carried out by virtue of position
Nor is the Church something whose activities are limited to those who have been appointed or voted into a position. We have done a great job of creating structure. Structures can be lifeless.

Not musically perfect
I think we've also made a god out of what some of us like to refer to as our choral tradition and four part harmony etc. Those who can't sing that well often feel left out there too. My Bible talks about making a joyful noise etc., no mention of choral necessities, four part harmony etc.

Don't get me wrong, I like that kind of music very much. I have enjoyed singing in such groups and choirs from when I was a child. I also like what we call Mennonite food - which is basically Ukrainian and Russian, a little more German for some.

However, if we want to celebrate that part of our heritage, let's do it outside the church like most ethnic peoples do. It's something to be thankful for, but it's not something to continue to keep us and them apart, and continue to reduce the growth potential of our churches. And don't even get me started
about so-called Mennonite writers and artists. Again, I like a lot of their work, I have subscribed and contributed to things like the Mennonite literary magazine 'Rhubarb', but many of them are not members of a Mennonite church, or if they were, are no longer practicing.


                                                                       

Lorne Brandt, 2005-3-13