As I was sitting in my favourite reading spot
for the first time in my nearly 2 months of retirement yesterday, enjoying
simply reading a book, I had the epiphanic (is that a word?) thought – when we
struggle to do the so many ‘ought’s that we all face very day, or most of us,
and just want to do what we want to do – are we simply lazy and shirking our
responsibilities, or are we following a basic good instinct?
Let me explain. Lately, I have been studying a
lot in the book of Genesis. Don’t let that turn you off yet – hear me out. One
reason is that I began a few weeks back to teach a series in our church’s
Sunday morning so-called Adult Education period entitled variously something
like “How We Got Here – How The Story of the Bible Became the Story of The
[Anabaptist/Mennonite] Church.” That parenthesis is in there because that is
who I am, that is who our church is, and there are some significant differences
between us and much of Christendom. We have a significant number of newcomers
in our church who do not come from a Mennonite background and they often have
questions that I hope this series can help answer. I am developing the series
as we go, although I already have an outline and a number of ready resources at
hand.
The other reason I have been looking at Genesis
is because some of our recent Sunday morning worship service messages have been
on Genesis and that material is what we base our midweek small group home Bible
studies on and I lead one of those groups. As I think about it, I remember that
we spent some time in Genesis last year too, as our pastor then led our church
through the whole Bible in one year. Actually, I have taught on Genesis in the
past, as I led some of these same students through the Bible in past Sunday
morning sessions, especially at one time with an emphasis on The Covenant.
Now, as I understand it, God really only left
mankind with two tasks after he had created us. The first was to tend the
garden, which was expanded into "subduing and having dominion over the
earth". However, the earth at that time still being considered
"good," it does not seem that this work would have been particularly
onerous, but that it would probably have been continuing enjoyably God's
creativity. The second command was to replenish the earth, which could refer to
the environment again, but also has generally been understood to refer to God's
desire for having man to reproduce and populate the earth.
At that time, we understand the climate was
obviously pleasant as man was naked. God also appeared to meet and commune
regularly with man. Everything was provided for. Therefore, it would appear
that's man would have been happy and content in that environment, wanting
nothing. Basically, with everything being so good, he could do whatever he
wanted and it was acceptable.
Something changed, according to the story in
Genesis chapter 3. Mankind apparently made some wrong choices and the beauty
and order of creation descended into chaos. One of the consequences of this
choice was that work, which would appear to have been a pleasant and possibly
even cooperative venture with The Creator became a challenge and no longer
necessarily pleasant or enjoyable. What we may long to do, like we may have
been doing at the beginning, has been replaced by all kinds of labor that is
repetitious, not always easy and often simply a drudgery. This is true whether
it is work for ourselves, at home, or work for others, outside the home. And
for all you students, this covers homework and studying as well. Unless you are
learning about something you really enjoy, which I think would have been an
activity we would have engaged in at the beginning as well, and may well do so
again in the New World.
We all know that underneath the issues of
responsibility that come with work nowadays, we often chafe at it and wish to
be doing something else. Like as not, what we wish to be doing is something
that is renewing, pleasant, enjoyable and quite often creative. Does this not
sound like the kind of activities I described that mankind was probably engaged
in before, as we say, things went south? (Actually, according to the Bible, it
seems man was first sent east.)
So, when we don't feel like working, but
turning to our pastimes and our hobbies instead, simply engaging in activities
together with others that we find enjoyable, perhaps we are actually responding
to the good instincts that we were created with and that have been suppressed
by the consequence of the nature of the work as it turned out after the wrong
choices were made. Perhaps those drives are actually good, and not evidence of
being lazy and shirking responsibility.
However, we also know that work gives us
purpose, meaning, helps provide order and structure in our life and can give us
a feeling of competence and satisfactory success. There is some good in work.
This is borne out not only by our own experience in life but also the research
which shows that work is one of the positive variables in a person's recovery
when they are ill. In this I find evidence of the merciful providence of our
Creator, that even in what was given to us as a consequence there can be a
positive. The Creator is also ever the Redeemer.
Of course, until the New World promised
appears, we still have to work in the old way. However, perhaps we need to look
at the kind of work we have to do as something that we should ever try to
lessen and lighten the load of. After all, when we talk about The Church, or The
Kingdom of Heaven on earth, we are always talking about trying to re-create
here what was at the beginning or will be in the new heaven and earth. Neither
of those included this kind of work. Therefore, perhaps we simply should not
feel guilty when we don't feel like working. It might be our basic creative goodness
wanting to be expressed. It is just our inner person wanting to get back to “the
garden,” which I usually picture as more of a park where we can relax and
unwind, than what we sometimes think as a garden with all its images of hard
work.
Hello!
ReplyDeleteI am enjoying reading your article-post, especially since I am studying the first 4 chapters of Genesis...I am writing an article for a blog. I am sinking into the knowledge of why God didn't want Adam and Eve to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. What was it about Adam and Even knowing the difference between good and evil that made God chuck them out of the Garden of Eden? Was it the fact they had disobeyed God? Or...was it also the fact that God didn't want Adam and Eve to eat from the tree of life...and live forever? And that they would eat from the tree of life now that they knew the difference between good and evil, and had, "...Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil..." (partial quote from Genesis 3: 22).
Anyway, I am digging deep into this part of the story because I am writing about what knowing the difference between good and evil...and the pre-existing state of consciousness...of NOT knowing the difference...perhaps a state of innocence, what that was like for Adam and Eve. For example, they didn't know they were "naked," and were okay with that...they did not know shame or fear of being naked, of doing something "wrong."
Enough for now,
All the Best!
Robert Farmilo
PS-Come on by and check out the blog and website:
http://www.thegodconsciousnessproject.com