Read Genesis 3
1. So,
what is the first thing that we are told happens in this story? We learn of a
specific animal now, a serpent or snake, and how is it described?
Is
it really craftier than any other wild animal that God had made?
2. What
might that mean? From what we know of snakes today, are they really that smart
compared to other animals? Or is this writer referring to what the specific
snake did?
3. What
is this talking snake anyway? If we look at how this whole story is treated in
the rest of the Bible, and even discern its meaning here, the humans are
obviously being tempted by something that is beyond them, let alone beyond the
animal kingdom. This has really been understood as the snake being possessed by
the devil on this occasion, and we know the devil never wants anything good to
come out of what God does.
4. So,
what else is being introduced too? A force for evil. So far we had read that everything that God had created was a
good. What happened between chapters 2 and three? Or when and where did this
evil come from? There are other passages in the Bible that indicate that there
is this other powerful super natural creature called Satan or the devil. It seems that Satan was perhaps once the most
prominent of God's angels but rebelled against him and was cast out of heaven.
Ever since, we see through the story of the Bible, Satan has waged war against
God and his creation.
5. What
do we learn about God in this chapter that we perhaps had not yet learned from
chapters 1 and two?
a.
We learn from verse three that God
had evidently told the humans that they could not eat of the fruit of the tree
that was in the middle of the garden, let alone touch it, or they would die. We see that God
had told the man this in 2:17, before the woman was created. The man no doubt
told the woman about this, but it would have been a second-hand command to her
and perhaps they stayed away from the tree to avoid that, until now. Perhaps
that is why the devil thought the woman would be easier to tempt.
b.
But what does the snake say? They
would not die that but their eyes would be opened and they would be like God,
knowing good and evil.
6. Is
the snake telling the truth?
7. What
does the woman take away from what the snake says? She believes that the snake
is telling her that this tree is also good for food, a delight to the eyes,
which they probably already knew, and that it was desired to make one wise.
8. So
what does she do? She eats some of it and also shares some of it with her
husband. They could
do this because, being created in God’s image, they were given what we know as free will. They were able to make a
choice. However, not being God, their will, when used, did not always lead to
good results.
9. So,
what happens next? Do they become wise? What do they learn about good and evil?
a. The
first thing we are told is that they realize that they are naked and quickly
stitched themselves some fig leaf clothes to cover their nakedness. What is the wisdom or the
knowledge of
good and evil in that? Well, perhaps a bit of both. We know how nakedness and
its temptations often leads to evil in our world, so maybe it is wise to cover
up.
b. The
man and woman realized there was a difference
between them and got the notion it was shameful, not good and needed to be hidden. So,
there is some evil in that too. We had not been told
prior to this that there was any negative difference between man and woman.
Now, a barrier begins to develop between the sexes. God’s good world is going
bad.
10. Why have these changes come into the world?
Humans listened to another voice and not God’s. They disobeyed God.
11. Why would they do that? Was there some fault
in God’s image? Here we learn something else about how we were created in God’s
image. What the humans did obviously shows they were
given what
we have come to know as free will.
They were able to make a choice. God did not make robots. However, not being
God, their will, when used, did not always lead to good results.
12. And what was the real thing that the humans
somehow grasped that they could be if they ate this fruit? What had the snake
said? They would be like God. And what makes people want to be like God? Is it
not pride? Some say that is the
first and basic sin and everything flows form that. Humans made a choice and
they/we are responsible for that and what happens as a result.
13. Now we learn something else about God we had
not yet known. Remember how we talked about God being personal and revealing
himself to us and wanting to show his love to us and be in
relationship
with us? What does it say in vs. 8? It sounds as though God had a habit of
coming to talk with the humans, perhaps on a daily basis, in the cool of he
evening – when the breezes blew. Isn’t that a wonderful picture? Walking and
talking in the garden with God? This was
probably the time when God taught the humans everything they needed to know
about the world they lived in and what they were to do in it, including how to
look after it and how to reproduce and replenish the earth, which were the two
commands he had given them.
14. But what did the humans do this time? They
hid? Why? Because of the nakedness they had realized they were in.
15. What is the message in that? Now we learn that
somehow the wisdom, if we can call it that, of becoming aware of evil vs. good
not only separates us from others, it separates
us from God.
Now humans
felt not only afraid of being exposed to one another, but being exposed to God.
What a terrible outcome from making a wrong choice - fear entered the world.
16. What does God say in verse 11? He knew exactly
what had happened, did he not? But like all good parents, he wants to hear what
his children have to say in their defense. He doesn't just come up with an
active response right away.
17. And what to the humans do? What do children
usually do when they're caught? Sometimes they tell lies. Sometimes they blame.
That is what Adam and Eve did. The man blamed the woman and the woman blamed
the snake. We don’t
want to be alone in our wrongdoing.
Thus, as we already again to notice, the man and woman became in some
ways separated from one another, alienated from their creator and actually
ending up alone, in spite of their wanting to be together. More problems
created by disobedience.
18. It does not seem that God gives the snake a
chance to defend itself. Why might that be? Well, a snake is not made in God's
image, it was not created with God's breath of life, so a real snake
would have
nothing to say. It was only the devil speaking through the snake, and God is
not going to give the devil any opportunities.
19. So what is the upshot of all of this? When we make a
decision, there is always going to be an outcome and if it is a bad decision,
result is usually a consequence . For whom? For all three,
the snake, the woman and the man. What are they?
a. The
consequences for the snake are
threefold: it will have to crawl on its belly from now on. This suggests that
it may have had legs like other animals prior to this.
b. It
will eat dust all the days of its life. This probably just refers to the fact
that it would be crawling on the ground and so of course exposed constantly to
dust.
c. Verse
15, the second part, points to a further consequence. What does this really
mean? On one level it obviously means that mankind now generally wants to kill
snakes when they see
them, striking their head. There will be a barrier how between snake and
humans. Is that not so for most humans? Are most humans not more afraid of
snakes than other animals, and perhaps women more than men? Seems like that all
started here.
20. On the other hand, poisonous snakes, which
crawl on the ground, bite humans, quite often on the foot, because that is what
they can reach.
However,
there are other references in the Bible that point to a deeper future meaning
to this. This is typical in the Bible. There are often several layers or
different meanings to a passage, the first one having to do with when the
action took place and other ones having to do with events in the future. We
believe that here it is saying that there would someday be a man, Jesus, who
would strike Satan a fatal blow, even though Satan thought he had struck Jesus
a fatal blow when Jesus was killed. What Satan did not realize, was that in
doing so, he sealed his own fate.
21. So, what are the consequences for the woman?
a. She
would have increased pain in childbirth. Does this suggest there would have
been some pain before that? Probably not, because we can't imagine pain being
good. It
probably
just means that the pain was going to be quite severe. This also points to the
Hebrew biblical understanding of the central role of the woman as a mother. Now
this role comes with problems.
b. Secondly,
it appears from the latter part of verse 16 that there would now be a negative
component to the relationship the woman has with her husband. They may have
been created equal. However, now it seems that in some ways the man would be
the ruler.
We know from
what we studied the last couple of weeks that this was not the way it was
supposed to be. God created woman as a helper for man but it does not say she
was not equal. Furthermore, when we read what Jesus and writers like Paul say
in the New Testament, we see that certainly in God's new Kingdom, which Christ
brought into existence, and which we can be part of when we believe, we are
also to be equal. That is certainly the way we as believers should function in
our families and in our churches.
c. Another
consequence that we can pick out here is guilt. The man and woman were ashamed
of what they had done. Fear entered the picture and the humans wanted to hide
from God when he came to look for them, as it seems he usually did.
d. The
woman also did not want to take sole responsibility for what she wanted to do
and wanted to make excuses and blame others, which Adam did too. We don’t want
to be
alone in our
wrongdoing. Thus, as we already again to
notice, the man and woman became in some ways separated from one another,
alienated from their creator and actually ending up alone, in spite of they’re
wanting to be together.
22. So
what were the specific consequences for the
man?
a. Remember
that man had been given the task of looking after the garden. Here he was told
first of all that because of his disobedience, the ground that he was to work
would be cursed. He
would have to work hard now at getting his food out of it, including fighting
weeds such as thorns and thistles. Just
like the woman’s main role of giving birth was affected by what they did, so is
the man’s.
b. But
then there was also that final result, in the latter part of verse 19. Man was
now going to die, return to the dust from which he had been created. The good earth is no longer so totally good.
23. There
are two other points that we can see here, if you can pick them out.
a. The
first is that not only did the earth and the plants suffer, animals did as
well. Some were killed, sacrificed, to make more durable leather coverings for
the humans to cover themselves
with instead of the flimsy fig leaf aprons they had made first. Another positive
and redemptive way of looking at this tells us that even though they were
disobedient, God still cares for and provide for his people.
b. Then,
God says because they might eat of the tree of life and live forever, they have
to be banned from the garden. They can no longer even live in the place which
God originally created and
placed them in. Again, the mercy of God might be showing here in not sentencing
them for an immortal life to a world that was now no longer as good.
24. Some have been troubled by the use of the word 'curse' in 3:14 and 17. How we understand this seemingly harsh denunciation depends somewhat on our view of how scripture came to be. People who tend to take the Bible more literally, without understanding context, original languages and worldviews when it was written, tend to read 'curse' as an action God has taken. Actually, it might often be more correct to understand sayings like this as God saying that you will be cursed, in the case of the snake, or the ground will be cursed, in the case of his words to Adam, as referring to the natural consequences of their actions, not something God willed. God never wills evil.
25. Another point that can be made with respect to texts in the Old Testament where, for example, it is said God said so-and-so, is that people then tended to see everything as ordained by the gods, and the early Hebrews might have been no better. So, if they defeated a certain tribe in battle, well God must have willed that, ergo... God said they should do that. Certainly again, one has to be careful about this. There are times when God in his infinite knowledge and justice does carry out judgment. For instance, take the case of the Amorites with whom the Israelites waged war when they returned from Egypt to Canaan. God had told Abraham 400 years earlier that this would happen, because he was, basically, 'not done with them.' How do we understand that? We can actually see the grace of God was at work here. The Amorites and other tribes around Israel in Canaan were very wicked. They burned their children in sacrifice to their gods in the hope that the gods would be appeased and grow their crops or give them success in battle. God basically gave them 400 years to 'clean up their act,' but they did not. So, God decided they had their chance and a lot of them were destroyed. Again, how much of it was active, how much a consequence of their own actions (see discussion of 'curse' above). God's mercy is limitless in some ways but it has its limits too. Even New Testament writers warn us not to test God's patience.
Read Genesis 4:1-16
24. Some have been troubled by the use of the word 'curse' in 3:14 and 17. How we understand this seemingly harsh denunciation depends somewhat on our view of how scripture came to be. People who tend to take the Bible more literally, without understanding context, original languages and worldviews when it was written, tend to read 'curse' as an action God has taken. Actually, it might often be more correct to understand sayings like this as God saying that you will be cursed, in the case of the snake, or the ground will be cursed, in the case of his words to Adam, as referring to the natural consequences of their actions, not something God willed. God never wills evil.
25. Another point that can be made with respect to texts in the Old Testament where, for example, it is said God said so-and-so, is that people then tended to see everything as ordained by the gods, and the early Hebrews might have been no better. So, if they defeated a certain tribe in battle, well God must have willed that, ergo... God said they should do that. Certainly again, one has to be careful about this. There are times when God in his infinite knowledge and justice does carry out judgment. For instance, take the case of the Amorites with whom the Israelites waged war when they returned from Egypt to Canaan. God had told Abraham 400 years earlier that this would happen, because he was, basically, 'not done with them.' How do we understand that? We can actually see the grace of God was at work here. The Amorites and other tribes around Israel in Canaan were very wicked. They burned their children in sacrifice to their gods in the hope that the gods would be appeased and grow their crops or give them success in battle. God basically gave them 400 years to 'clean up their act,' but they did not. So, God decided they had their chance and a lot of them were destroyed. Again, how much of it was active, how much a consequence of their own actions (see discussion of 'curse' above). God's mercy is limitless in some ways but it has its limits too. Even New Testament writers warn us not to test God's patience.
1. What
happens, now that Adam and Eve appear to have been expelled from the garden?
They produce the first two sons, Cain and then Abel.
2. Why
do you think the word knew is used for an obvious reference to sexual
relations? Some interpreters say it links the area of sex with the shame and
nakedness that occurred with new knowledge gained by eating the fruit of the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Sex was no doubt created good, but their
sin cast a shadow on it.
3. What
do you make of the statement of Eve's, that the Lord helped her produce a
child? In the first instance, this could well simply refer to the fact that God
had to teach and help his humans learn everything they needed to survive,
including how to experience childbirth. It could also refer to Eve's
recognition that she had survived the consequence of pain in childbirth and she
attributes this to help from God. Thus, as we have already seen, in the midst
of sin and its consequences, God still shows mercy. She might be rejoicing
that, even though they have been punished, she, like God, can also bring forth
humanity.
4. So
what happened to Cain and Abel? Cain became farmer and Abel the Shepherd. In
the culture of those days, those who grew crops where given higher recognition
then those who herded animals.
5. What
then do we read that Cain and Abel did? First of all, Abel brings God a
sacrifice of his first born of his crop. Then it sounds as though Cain realized
he too needed to make a sacrifice and brought some of his grain.
6. Why
do you think God accepted Abel’s sacrifice but not Cain’s? We really are not
given an answer here, although later in the Old Testament we learn that God wanted
the first of animals born and of the crops.
Perhaps this is because these are often the best, and God, we know,
wants the best from us. It does not say that Cain brought the first of his
crops and perhaps this is reinforced by the fact that it simply mentions that
he brought them later. These might be the reasons that God favored Abel, but
the text really does not tell us this so we have to be careful about drawing
any conclusions here.
7. Is
there something else here we recognize between the brothers? Just as in other
biblical stories, God does not always recognize the first born, which is what
humans and their cultures have done. He looks for what people do and what is in
their heart.
8. What
does Cain do? He killed his brother.
9. What
is the result of that?
9.In
the first place, reminiscent of God coming into the garden looking for Adam and
Eve after they sinned, God comes looking for Cain.
10. What
does he tell Cain? He does come at him with some of of an accusing tone. He
tells him that what he is thinking his sinful and suggests that it is up to him
to control it, that it is not too late to do so.
11. What
does Cain do? Not only does Cain not control his anger, he lets it grow and
schemes a way to lure his brother into a field so he can kill him.
12. Why
do you think he would have done that? Away from the family I guess. When we do
something wrong, we generally try to hide it. That’s human nature.
13. What
happens then? God again comes looking for Cain and makes it clear that he knows
Abel is killed.
14. What
does Cain mean by this question "Am I my brother's keeper?" He might
simply be referring crudely to Abel's occupation of a keeper of animals, saying
that Abel is not his animal so he is not responsible for him. He might also be
accusing God of not fulfilling his responsibility of looking out for the humans
he has created, trying to absolve himself of responsibility as his answer has generally
been understood anyway.
15. What
are the consequences for Cain? He will now not be able to farm any longer
because the blood of his brother has cursed the ground for him. He will be a
fugitive and wanderer.
15.Cain
appears to be immediately afraid that his life is now in danger because he took
someone’s life. Again, just as with Adam and Eve’s fear of God after disobeying
him, here we see that sin also creates fear towards others. In this way, just
as Adam and Eve's bad choice created differences and separation between them,
as husband-and-wife, marital partners, and between them and God, this wrong
choice of Cain's shows that sin in this world also creates separation and
conflict between siblings.
16. What
does God do? He does not kill Cain; in fact, he somehow seems to shield him as
a person that is not to be killed.
What again does it say about God? Even to a
murderer, God is merciful. What does this say to us about capital punishment?
No comments:
Post a Comment