Search This Blog

Showing posts with label faithfulness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label faithfulness. Show all posts

Monday, 16 January 2017

Fire Escape, Sinking Ship and Being Born Again

Fire Escape, Sinking Ship and Being Born Again

Some of you might be reading that and wondering, What in the world do those three things have to do with each other? Others of you will already understand.

Some of you have heard the pitch, you have to be born again to escape the fires of hell. Or, to free yourselves of the clutches of this decadently evil and sinking, decaying ship (society). Nowadays, these phrases are probably mostly heard from television or the radio. You might hear them in your church or some special meetings. More so in the past, they were the stock catchphrases of the evangelistic crusades. 

Now, don't get me wrong. I am not entirely knocking any of the above. I have not only attended but also taken part in and supported crusades in the past by Billy Graham, Barry Moore, the, Ken Campbell and the Sutera twins, not to mention Anabaptism's own Brunk brothers and Myron Augsburger. People have experienced changed lives because of the efforts of these teams.

However, as some of them will also honestly admit, based on their own follow-up surveillance, many who make decisions at or around the time of these events, do not follow through. In medicine, when physicians attend a continuing education conference or learn some new guidelines, but don't really end up putting all of that new knowledge into practice, we call that a knowledge gap or a failure of translation of knowledge from word to deed. The same thing happens with many of these evangelistic efforts, whether it is a crusade or television broadcast.

You see, turning away from your old life to follow The Way, or, if you will, being "born again" or "becoming a Christian," is only a start. Somehow though, over the last two or three centuries out of the nearly 10 centuries that The Church has been in existence, too much attention and effort has been put into a certain way of inviting people into The Kingdom of God. We have had John chapter 3, with Jesus’ reference to being born-again and his apparent final words in Matthew 28 emphasized at the expense of a lot of other important biblical material (I used the word apparent because I think I recall reading somewhere that some believe these words were added later to express a certain point of view and may not have been the original words of our Lord). This emphasis on "winning souls" also causes a lot of guilt on the part of those who are constantly reminded that this is what they’re to be about if they want to earn their "stars" in heaven, but find that they're not very successful in “converting” their families, relatives, neighbors, friends or co-workers. In all of this, we seem to forget that we cannot convert anyone, only the Holy Spirit can, and to do so, it needs to find soil that is ready and prepared for the growth of the CD that is planted with the hearing of The Word. This flask is the test of The Church, but one that often we often fail in. That is in part because new converts are often not successfully linked to the physical expression of The Body of Christ somewhere, or even if they are, the receiving congregation doesn't provide a nurturing atmosphere necessary for growth in The Way to continue.

Christianity has too often been reduced to a program, strategies, aimed at getting people in the door of the church building. To be sure, many churches also do a good job of engaging these individuals, their members, in things like small groups. Sometimes the emphasis here is more on fellowship, helping the newcomers feel more like they belong, then that these are an avenue of serious learning more about it what it means to be a Christian and growing in The Way.

Some of these valiant evangelistic efforts are based on the so-called missionary travels of The Apostle Paul. However, what gets lost in the ‘knowledge translation’ here is that the Acts of the Apostles and Paul's own letters indicate that he often spent months and even years in some of these congregations, trying to make sure they were established in The Way, before moving on to a new destination. Not only that, he often returned to spend time in these congregations or dispatched others to make sure they were doing well. And of course, he wrote letters to them, some of which we still have. He and his helpers worked at the individual relational level. This is often lacking in The Church today.

As for our efforts to try and get people through the church doors, The Church in the New Testament and The Early Church times did not even have church buildings to invite people to. If you read the writings of the Early Church, it does not appear that they were very many come if any, individuals engaged in evangelism in the way we are familiar with it today, as described at the beginning of this writing.

Some of us have come to realize that what we have failed to do is cultivate discipleship in the newcomers. This is what the early church took very seriously and was good at. This was all it took for the church to grow slowly but surely so that by the fourth century AD, the Roman Empire, which had been persecuting them to that point, basically capitulated and became Christian. Unfortunately, that led to a whole new other interpretation of Christianity, which set it on another course that was not that helpful, for the next Thousand use and then some. I am referring to what some called Christendom, with all of its ramifications of the union of church and state, but that would be the subject of another article.

What the early church practiced was the development of spiritual virtues. To be sure, there are recorded instances in the New Testament of individuals being converted and baptized on the spot. In other words, becoming members of The Kingdom. What we forget though is that in many of these instances, the individuals, and sometimes their families, were already following God as they knew him from Judaism, so they new a lot about what it meant to be a follower or live the life of a disciple. However, it did not take long when the church moved into the Gentile world, for it to realize that a lot of time and effort needed to be put into helping reprogram, if you will, the pagans to the Christian way of life. Those who became interested by the witness of the word, and more often the action, of their neighbors, and wanted to become a follower of Christ, were assigned to sponsors who worked diligently and intensively with them for a year or two, while they and the rest of the local congregation observed the catechumenate, as they have been come to be called, to see whether they were really showing signs of having the fruits of the Spirit within them. Here again, we have another example of where a Scriptural concept has been somewhat distorted. “The fruits of the Spirit” has to often been interpreted as the number of souls won, instead of spirit-given virtues cultivated.


Many who have been busy doing what they described in the earlier part of this essay are turning their back on it having rediscovered that what we are called to be is faithful where God has placed us, in our neighbourhood or parish (when I dictated that word with my computer's voice recognition, it came out perish, LOL as they say nowadays, which could be true enough as well). What we need to focus on is cultivating virtue, and making sure the needs of ourselves, our fellow saints and our neighbors are met in ways in which we see God working. I suggest that is where we need to direct our efforts in the future.

Friday, 30 December 2016

Telling Our Stories: My Story 1 - Coming Full Circle - back to faithfulness, patience, humility & simplicity

Telling Our Stories

My Story 1 - Coming Full Circle

I grew up among ordinary people. Perhaps some of them wish to see themselves otherwise. Certainly, they were generally hardworking. There are innovators among them, even successful entrepeneurs and businessmen. By and large though, they were, notwithstanding my mother and paternal grandfather being teachers, and my father a pastor, all individuals of minimal education. The people I descended from were mostly farmers. Then ones I lived among were hunters, trappers, and fishermen.

Perhaps that is why I never became a person of big words or fancy phrases. I am not an intellectual. I did go on to become a medical specialist and even in training there was told I needed to use more of the vocabulary of the specialty; in plain words, psychiatric jargon in my case. I probably never totally satisfied some of my teachers in that regard. Some of it was me, some of it was my purpose.

I grew up then among simpler people, and I do not say that negatively at all, as I believe there is virtue in that, as some today are rediscovering. My roots are Anabaptist/Mennonite and humility and simplicity were values in that circle. To some extent there was even a bias among some of my ancestors against higher learning and the pretension it was felt often accompanied that. You’re never popular if you make it too evident you’re trying to be above your roots. 

This last was also a characteristic of the Metis and First Nations people; the other groups among whom I grew up, many of whose first language was not English. They, in many instances, just did not have the privilege - “white” I learned later in life I had. I have to credit my parents for not letting us think we were any different than these neighbours, classmates and friends. Indeed, unlike far too many of my settler colonist ilk, they never said a negative word about them.  

On the other hand, a lot of their good qualities were highlighted and I learned from that. Sharing was a big thing in that economy. Those who had, shared. Patience was also a solid virtue. No one can outwait an Indian, as we called them then. Their self-effacing attitude and associated wit also helped in the cultivation of humility. These are also Christian virtues.

All of this is part of what made me determined to always try and express myself so that the message got across simply enough. When I got into medicine I concluded this was especially important. We knew, in the profession, we were being taught a language that was esoteric to most. That made me all the more determined to keep my language at a level those I served could understand. This was true for medicine and also for language related to the Bible, church and theology. I remember one fellow church member once saying it was felt to be an asset or even gift to be able to communicate in more dense church language. I don’t understand that from a Teacher whose advice in the Sermon on the Mount, the manifesto of the Anabaptists, was to keep your communication to Yes and No. 

So, now, entering my eighth decade, some in the Church are coming around to a place that some of our people never left. The days of the evangelistic crusade, the televangelist and the mega church have lost their lustre. As the authors of “The New Parish” Sparks, Soerens and Friesen write, it’s time to get back to our neighbourhoods. Too long we have believed the lie that we could live ‘above place,’ disconnected from our neighbourhood, our land, our world. Our churches are consumer-oriented - yes, some even use the phrase ‘user-friendly’ - and commuter-based. They are not community churches in many instances. It’s also time to reclaim the virtues of patience, faithfulness and humility, as Alan Kreider writes in “The Patient Ferment of the Early Church.” Our mission, and the church lived this for the first 3 centuries before the Roman Empire co-opted the church, was simply to be faithful. That was enough for the empire to fall before the church. Unfortunately, the church became swallowed by the empire and we were subjected to 1700 years of Christendom. Now that is fading, and it’s time to get back to basics. 


Big is not always better. Indeed, Jesus’ whole mission and demonstration of who God is tells us that, but we lost sight of that. Now, I am going to delve into “Shrink” by Tim Suttle and see what that adds to what I have read this last year that so resonates with me and what I have been trying to be about and seeking for in life. Thanks be to God, the truth is still out there and it will make us free. Jesus said that,.. but of course you knew that.

Monday, 14 November 2016

Twenty Principles We Can Derive from the Old Testament of the Bible

XI. A. Recap: what did we learn from the Old Testament?
 HOW DID WE GET HERE? OUR* CHURCH IN THE 21ST CENTURY
*Mennonite/Anabaptist
The Story of the Bible Becomes the Story of Our Church

2016 11 13 Review
If I were to ask you, what are some of the key things that concern you as a member of your church today I think one of them would be, How do we do church? Another would be, How do we turn seekers into disciples? We might also ask, What does it mean to be the people of God, the Church?
Now, there are others in our modern world who are concerned with these topics and have even written books and give speeches and hold workshops and conferences, teach courses, on contemporary applications of them. However, sometimes I think we do well to look at the past and see how things were done then, what worked then.
When I started teaching the class which forms the background to these blog installments, one of my aims was to re-visit the origins of the people of God, the church, going all the way back to the beginning, to creation. Then I wanted to move forward through time, coming eventually to focus particularly on the Reformation and the Anabaptist/Mennonite branch of Christianity of which I am a member and how it fits into the big picture.
From January to June 2016, we completed a survey of the Old Testament. We learned some key concepts of what God was doing with his people, how he created this group and what he gave them. These were reviewed in our first class of Season II held at Peace Mennonite Church on November 13, 2016 and are summarized in 20 points below.
Now, we want to learn what was changed or added to this in the New Testament and subsequently. Since June, I have been led by the Spirit, I believe, to a number of readings on what happened in The Early Church after the New Testament era. This has been most enlightening and I think has a lot to offer us as to the answers of those questions we spoke of above. Some of what we will learn might surprise us.
I would invite you again to come and join in this exploration of what was happening with the people of God in the New Testament, and what is happening with them up until today.

From last January to June [2016], some of you attended Season I of this series, in which we went through the Old Testament from Genesis to the Malachi. As you will recall, the purpose of these classes was:
1.    To trace the fundamental principles that the Bible introduces in terms of what it means to be the people of God, or as we now often also refer to ourselves, the church.
2.    A second purpose was to try and see what in the Old Testament spoke to the New Testament teachings of Jesus and the apostles that we as Anabaptists in particular
have taken as instruction for what it means to be the church, the people of God. In the Old Testament, of course, the people of God largely referred to The Children of Israel, or the Jews or Hebrews.

I wanted to be clear to the student and reader that I am not saying that what I am putting forth is the only understanding or interpretation of all of this material. I'm always open to your contributions and insights. The Bible is interpreted by all of us together as a community. That is another Anabaptist or Mennonite viewpoint. That is because we believe that we all have the Holy Spirit living within us, if we are Christians, and we understand that the Holy Spirit played a role in providing us this Bible, and therefore in helping us understand it now.

Now, we will turn our attention to the New Testament, and ultimately, to the history of the church after the New Testament. We will look at the same concepts we learned in Season I as well as see if there are any really entirely new concepts introduced in the New Testament and possibly even subsequently. Before we did that though, especially since it has been a number of months since we ended Season I, and because not all of you were not able to attend all of the classes, we did do a review.

I should say that in this review, we will not be referring that much if at all to any specific biblical passages. We did a lot of that in every lesson last year and will continue to do that once we get into the New Testament. So, let us look at where I believe we have come so far, before we move on.

1.    There is one God.
2.    Everything begins with God.
3.    God created everything.
4.    God created everything in order.
5.    God created everything good, as in beautiful.
6.    God also created everything different. Not only is there incredible diversity, no one unit is like another.
7.    God created mankind in his image.
8.    God created us to be in relationship with him and one another.
9.    God created us because of his love and desire for fellowship with us.
10. God is Love.
11. Man made a poor choice and God's perfect creation was spoiled by sin.
12. God was ready with Plan B, offering man away out of what he had fallen into.
13. God is our Redeemer. He redeems individuals and their cultures and will someday redeem the world.
14. God calls individuals to be a new people set apart from this fallen world.
15. God makes covenants and keeps his promises.
16. God is Faithful.
17. God gave The Law to show people what was expected of them in terms of their behavior.
18. God gave instructions as to what was expected in terms of worship.
19. God gave instructions in regards to building a place of worship.

20. God makes accommodations for humans in their weakness, e.g. allowing divorce, allowing his people to have a king, and a temple in their capital city.